The contest to name the new polar research ship has now closed and Boaty McBoatface was the runaway winner with 124,109 votes. The next most popular name (Poppy-Mai, to commemorate a sixteen-month-old girl with incurable cancer) had only 34,371. It’s Bloody Cold Here came in fourth with 10,679.
So is the government going to respect the will of the people? Probably not. Admit it, you wouldn’t have bet much on the chances, would you?
Science Minister Jo Johnson announced that “the new royal research ship will be sailing into the world’s iciest waters to address global challenges that affect the lives of hundreds of millions of people. That’s why we want a name that lasts longer than a social media news cycle.”
Those two sentences don’t entirely hang together, but never mind. If you stick a wad of that’s why in between them, they give the appearance of connection and hardly anybody stops to think, Icy waters? Social media cycle? Wait a minute, what do they have to do with each other?
Besides, the name’s already lasted longer than your average social media cycle. Adopt it that and it’ll last longer yet. Furthermore, you’re the guys who created a contest on social media. What did you think was going to happen?
Oh, stop arguing, Ellen. They’re not listening.
So is anyone upset by this? Well, as the Guardian headline so mildly put it, “Tyrants have crushed the people’s will.”
The Guardian doesn’t go in for overstatement and never will.
And a Guardian letter writer asked how, if you can’t trust the people to choose the name of a ship, you can trust them to decide whether or not to leave the European Union.
We’ll let those two comments speak for the nation, okay? I’m sure it’s a representative sample.
In case you need to know this, Science Minister Jo is male, in spite of the way he spells his name. This may be one of those British/American things, because a Robert Burns poem mentions a Jo whose full name is John Anderson (“John Anderson, my Jo”). (I’m using the British mostly lower-case headline and title style here, which feels entirely weird when the only lower-case letter in on my. Never mind. That’s a digression within a digression.) The news story referred to this Jo—Jo Johnson—as he, reasonably enough, but since the Guardian, even if it doesn’t go in for overstatement, used to indulge in typos so freely that it was known as the Grauniad, I wondered if the S in she had gone a-wandering among the fields so green, and I fact-checked it.
Don’t laugh. The little bit of fact checking that I do here—you know, when something truly important comes up—keeps me from spinning off into outer space.
After all that, I didn’t end up referring to Jo as either he or she, but having fact-checked it, I couldn’t let all that work go to waste. Hence this meander through waves of irrelevancy and bad metaphor, after which we’ll return to our point if we remember what it was—and who, in addition to me, we is made up of.
Our topic, girls and boys, was the people’s will, so I hope you’ll allow me to say this: Boaty McBoatface, you were a great ship, even if you continue to be an imaginary one. Your memory will never be sullied by the failures encountered by real ships. And your name will forever appear in the italics proper to all great ships, even if it never graces the prow of a research vessel.
Wanna bet a hundred rowboats, sailboats, and fishing boats appear around the coasts of Britain sporting that name?
So. With the important stuff out of the way, we can now turn to our second news update, which has to do with the doctors’ strikes. I’ll run through as quick a summary as I can manage in an effort to keep anyone who isn’t British—oh, you know I have to say it: on board.
Quick summary: Tyrants crush the people’s will.
No, that was about Boaty. Sorry.
Longer quick summary: Our darling government has been screwing around with a beloved British institution (beloved and the screwing around are not exaggerations; darling is written with a snarl), the National Health Service, to the point where the NHS is now in serious trouble. At some point in the screwing-around process, the government decided to put a category of hospital doctors—called junior doctors, although they aren’t all that junior, but this is complicated enough, so let’s not get into that—on a seven-day schedule. Since it’s not funding the NHS well enough to keep the current five-day service from crumbling at the edges—well, I’m bad at math but even I see some problems here. To oversimplify vastly (sorry: I wrote a longer and infinitesimally more nuanced summary but it made pretty grim reading and I dumped it), the answer is to stretch the doctors even more thinly over the NHS drum.
The two sides negotiated for a while and when that broke down the health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, announced that he’d go ahead and impose the new contract. The doctors announced a series of one- and two-day strikes and five of them initiated a lawsuit, arguing that Hunt has no power to impose a contract.
So that’s the background. The latest twist is that Hunt’s response to the suit no longer talks about “imposing” the contract but about “introducing” it.
No big thing, I’d have thought, but I’d have been wrong, wrong, wrong. The doctors’ lawyer—sorry, let’s get all British here and call her a solicitor, because that’s what she is. Think of it this way if you’re confused: A solicitor is a lawyer; a barrister is a lawyer with chocolate sprinkles, in a waffle cone and a wig. Did that help?
The doctors’ solicitor says, “If the secretary of state was pretending to have a decision-making power but in fact only had the power to make recommendations…the secretary of state will have acted unlawfully by purporting to exercise a power he never had.”
Ouch.
The government is claiming he has the power to introduce the new terms under the 2006 NHS Act. But to impose the new terms? Where is that written? This begins to sound like a constitutional issue, doesn’t it? And that’s why I dragged you through all that not-terribly-fun background. Because Britain has what it likes to call an unwritten constitution, which is made up of past laws, unwritten conventions (these govern procedure), common law (that means precedent), and a random collection of written documents ranging from the Magna Carta (1215) to the Human Rights Act (1998) to a scrap of paper I lost in the mound on the floor beside my computer (2016).
What fascinates me is how you challenge or defend a politician’s power to do something when you have to argue it on the basis of an unwritten constitution. Do you read every case law that might be vaguely relevant? Every statute? How many pages is that? What if you miss the important one? How do you find out about unwritten conventions? Better yet, how do you prove you didn’t make them up? Or that someone else didn’t? They’re, um, not written. Do you do a quick recon on the Magna Carta to see what it had to say, in 1215, about the National Health Service, which wouldn’t be created for another 800 or so years? Will anyone notice that I lost that scrap of paper? Does the future of the NHS rest on my lousy filing habits? Only time will tell, folks. It was on lined yellow paper, with a strip torn off the bottom where I jotted down a phone number. If you see it, let me know ASAP, okay? It could be important.
To answer those questions at the end (“Do you read every case law that might be vaguely relevant? . . .”), yes, to all those questions. That’s what attorneys–I mean, solicitors do. You pick a field and you become an expert in it, and you’re supposed to know all of that stuff, and then people pay you big bucks/pounds.
I saw the news story rejecting “Boaty McBoatface” and thought of your blog–I think the Science Minister should get over himself. It’s just a research ship and Boaty McBoatface is as good a name as any. If he wasn’t willing to accept the answer, he should not have asked the question.
LikeLiked by 5 people
I’m guessing that whoever came up with the idea of a contest has been kicked from one end of Westminster to the other. Which is a shame, because they (politicians, bureaucrats) always talk about how much they want public involvement, and gee, they did get it this time.
LikeLike
“I’m pretty sure it happened” Hey, that covers a lot of ground. In this country, you might get half the jury do go along with you on that. We’d sue for sure if that boat wasn’t call Boaty McBoatface (it’s really a very cool name – cool…ice…get it?) Well, I’m sure I saw that yellow sheet of paper and I’m equally sure it said “we will bow to the will of the people when naming that boat” right next to the number for the curry place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The number of the curry place! I’ve been looking for that as well. Now all I have to do is find that piece of paper and all our problems will be solved.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Boaty McBoatface is a lovely name for a ship.
As for the EU, why not rename it rather than leave it? The EU could take a poll…..
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now that’s a great idea–hold a contest and rename the EU. I nominate Big Damn Buncha Countries.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s good – but I am sure that the Germans have a single word for The Place Where Everyone Eats Cheese.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a clever and useful language. If someone figures out what the word is, even thought I won’t understand it I’ll bypass my own nominee and vote for it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t understand a word of German but I know it is a wonderful language just by trying to pronounce the words. For instance, in German, the word for patriotism translates to: an intense longing that may never be satisfied for a place where everyone loves really sharp, really smelly cheese.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You wouldn’t be pulling my leg or anything, would you, just because I admitted to not knowing any German?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t really know if I am pulling your leg because I don’t know any German either. :)
LikeLiked by 2 people
I kinda think that was my leg because, you know, if it had been someone else’s I don’t think I’d have felt the tug that strongly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Germans might not have a single word for The Place Where Everyone Eats Cheese, but the Americans do.
It’s called Wisconsin.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oooh, that gets a prize: an invisible and entirely imaginary wheel of good Wisconsin cheddar.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m taking a big imaginary bite right now :D
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, with that chosen name, I’d for once be happy if the government would do their usual thing and ignore the will of the people. And anyway, who’d call 124,109 votes the will of the people?
Have a great weekend,
Pit
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, I wouldn’t want to take this too seriously, but I like the name for its uncompromising idiocy.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Am smiling. “Uncompromising idiocy”: never more truly spoken! ;)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Has there ever been a move in Britain to move from an unwritten Constitution to an actual written one?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good question. The official answer is, I don’t know. If there has been, I suspect it was doomed by the British love of tradition. And every political faction’s distrust of all the other political factions–something that’s not particularly British but that factor heavily in anyone’s decision. There’s already a marginally workable system, however insane it may be, so why give all those other bastards a chance to stack the deck in their favor.
You know….
LikeLiked by 1 person
I too saw the Boaty McBoatface story, both in Canada and in the states – Tyrants crushing the will of the people is big news, nowadays. But no one bothered meandering through the inadequate logic and gender naming process that is the British. I got a few chuckles.
As for challenging the constitution – I imagine that the doctors’ solicitor is actually John Cleese in a Fish Called Wanda. I have every confidence she will be brilliant.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It does sound like she’s brilliant. Now all she has to do is win, which us the hard part.
Tyrants crushing the will of the people is only big news when it’s about something irrelevant and funny (she said sourly). Most of the time the world just dances on, treating it like business as usual.
LikeLike
Health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, is doing that thing that politicians always do when it becomes evident to them that their proposed course of action is the wrong one – insist on carrying out said action no matter what. Plus, he wants to be seen as the government’s tough guy, in the image of ex education minister Michael Gove. He doesn’t seem to have noticed that Gove’s tough guy act with the teachers didn’t work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But along the same lines, Gove is still insisting that they’re going to turn all schools into academies, in spite of discontent within his own party, not to mention the evident insanity of the idea.
LikeLike
Hmmm … could you be persuaded to explain the difference between a school and an academy? (If you already did so, forgive me … I was gone from Blogland most of the time I was in South Africa.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I suspect I didn’t, and I kinda knew I should but I wasn’t listening. The schools have been under the control of local government, and one of their responsibilities is to make sure there are enough places for every student, which takes a bit of planning ahead–something that’s not too difficult unless there’s a sudden influx of new residents, since kids get older at a fairly steady rate. Academies are free of local control–some are for-profit or nonprofit chains, some (I suspect not many) are started by parents or teachers or religions. They’re not responsible for counting noses and figuring out if there will be places for all the kids. So, guess what? When all the schools become academies, no one’s in charge of that.
And if that isn’t enough of a problem, in the name of competition, academization leaves all the schools answerable to the central government, sidelining local people. And parents, who could at least take positions as school governors, but a recent move will sideline them as well.
I could go on, but that’s enough. It’s another idea worked out in ten minutes on the back of an envelope.
LikeLike
Yikes. I can see some sense in a central government body setting a core syllabus and basic standards … but dammit, I wish governments would learn to back off and trust the people who elected them! Although maybe that’s precisely why they don’t trust them … they know what idiots we are… :(
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point. Groucho Marx once said he wouldn’t want to belong to any club that would have them. Maybe the corollary of that is that politicians wouldn’t trust anyone who voted for them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why not just rename them Academy Macademyface to compensate The People?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good compromise suggestion, but it just doesn’t roll off the tongue the way Boaty McBoatface does.
LikeLike
I rarely comment on politics, British or otherwise, but I will say this: we’re fucked, But then we always have been…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, that does cut right to the heart of the issue.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What the government are intent on doing (or continue doing) to the NHS is actually despicable. It is as if they drew up a list of the very things that make Britain great and decided to pick them to pieces and destroy them. I actually have no words, just despair.
As for Boaty McBoatface, my husband and I both whooped with delight when we read it had won. With everything that is going on in the world right now, a bit of silliness and humour was just the counterpoint required. However, on a more serious note, the daft competition had people engaged in something that otherwise would have garnered little or no attention from the Joe Bloggs public. Would it not, therefore, be a good thing to keep them engaged by having missives sent back from the good ship Boaty McBoatface rather than from some vessel whose name everyone will forget in no time at all. Sometimes the silliness is the right tool to engage people and expose them to information they would otherwise ignore – something I remember well from my years of teaching. I hope the will of the people is upheld.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wonder if any of the online petition groups would take up the Boaty McBoatface issue. 38 Degrees, are you listening?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think they are throwing away a tremendous opportunity to get more people to pay attention to science by not naming the ship Boaty McBoatface. They’ll likely name it after some boring dead person and everyone will give one big collective yawn and resume looking at cute kitten videos. In an article I saw after reading your original post on this some Australian horse owners named their racehorse Horsey McHorseface. Now, who wouldn’t want to bet on him just to be able to cheer him on?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am so glad to know that about the horse. Thanks for a good laugh this morning.
LikeLike
OK, I’m thoroughly confused, but hoping it’s simply the jet lag.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, it’s probably exposure to my thought process. It’ll pass.
LikeLike
The BMA is amazing lobbying body…able to turn out their members, turn the attack on any challenger and fight to the death for the status quo. The last major negotiation on doctors pay managed to pay them more for doing less (including dropping off out of hours cover).
I am no friend of the current government, I am a fan of the NHS, but I have seen enough to know that it is never as simple as “bad old (insert name of Minister)”, “good old Doctors”. Ernest Bevan managed to get the doctors support for setting up the NHS but to achieve that as he famously said he, “stuffed their mouths with gold”.
It is fair to say the doctors are having to do more with less; they are by no means the first and they will not be the last, but they might be among the most articulate and influential. It would be great if we could leverage the same passion in support of nurses, teachers, police officers, let alone cleaners, carers and a hundred other roles.
Lets talk over tea and cake,
J’suis Boaty McBoatface
LikeLiked by 1 person
I couldn’t agree more about rallying the same support around other professions–and around the nonprofessional medical workers, who have taken a beating lately. Personally, I haven’t forgiven the BMA for not opposing the reorganization of the NHS until the very last minute, by which time the battle was already lost.
Nous sommes tous Boaty McBoatface, and let that be our rallying cry.
LikeLike
So, I recently did a module on law, nestled away in my MSc. It’s far from comprehensive, as it’s a single module and relates mostly to water law. But there are a few things my eccentric lecturer (oh, like there’s any other kind) was adamant about, that the fact that UK constitution could rest on a piece of paper Ellen misplaced is one of them.
The lesson in the UK law is this: no one reads the law and those that do (lost in a rounding error) aren’t listened to because the law is complicated and does not make for an interesting news story. Therefore, absolute shit happens without public scrutiny because no one thinks they care.
The real answer here is in contract law; a contract is an agreement between two parties. No one has a right to introduce a contract only agreed by one party.
(There’s a reason Jeremy Hunt’s name has been mispronounced on television and has replace ‘James Blunt’ as rhyming slang.)
Ellen is absolutely right: it’s no exaggeration to say the British love the NHS, and (as anyone who knows a UK doctor can probably attest) what the stupid Hunt is doing really is nothing short of screwing with it. To death.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whooo! Tell ’em.
What you said about contract law is interesting–and now that you’ve said it seems obvious, only it wasn’t before you said it. Thanks for adding that to the discussion.
And on a more serious note, I can’t hear Jeremy Hunt’s name anymore without wanting to giggle like a ten-year-old who just learned a dirty word. The story, for anyone who doesn’t know it (which will be anyone in another country), is this: He was, for a while, the culture secretary, and a BBC presenter transposed the C from culture into his name. I doubt anyone will think of him again without hearing its echoes.
And finally, I have no idea how your lecturer knew about that paper I lost. It’s embarrassing to have my mistakes travel that far into the world, but I suppose it was inevitable.
LikeLike
Well, it’s not that far. I’m only a few hours drive up the A30 from you. But, if you will lose a part of the British constitution, news will travel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll never live this down, will I?
LikeLike
Turns out you can just write something else on a piece of paper and hand that to a police officer. He’ll put it under his hat and take it straight to the queen. #fact
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay, I’ve heard that any pregnant woman has the right to demand an officer’s hat if she needs to pee in it (I won’t swear it’s true but it strikes me as too bizarre not to be), but a note under a hat going direct to the queen???? Haven’t they heard of the Royal Mail?
LikeLike
Poor Boaty McBoatface sunk before she ever got to sail!
As for the government and the people isn’t that a dichotomy? I think the Doctors should work 8 days a week, like the Beatles song… I found you over at Danny’s Meet & Greet, nice to visit you! Great post!! :-)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Deb. Nice to have you around. But I do think 8 days a week is a little harsh since they’re already working 27-hour days.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL!! Slackers!!! ;-)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Listen, a 27-hour day isn’t easy. Our cat works amazingly hard just to get in the 27 hours of sleep that cats need every day. Can you imagine what it’s like if you’re actually working?
LikeLiked by 1 person
In my next life I’m coming back as a cat! 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s my plan as well. And I’ll pick my people carefully. They need to be attentive but not intrusive, worshipful but not annoying about it. Available at all hours. And they need to live someplace with a cat flap or a window I can come and go through in the brief moments when I’m awake and not eating.
LikeLiked by 1 person
OMG!! You are hilarious!! Truth be told I’d actually be a dog…although a cat is much more fitting as I am very finicky. ;-)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow. What a great reply. Thanks.
If you come back as a dog, please don’t chase me.
LikeLike
Much deserved!! :-)
I promise I won’t chase you! As a matter of fact I think we would be great friends!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Our household is a pretty good demonstration of dog-cat friendships: The older dog was raised by our cat and turned around and raised the next cat. So I’m sure we can manage it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Huh, so does the dog meow and the younger cat bark? That’s really sweet!! I thought we could work it out. 🐶🐱
LikeLiked by 1 person
For a while there I did think the cat would bark. When he was a kitten, he wanted to grow up to be a dog, but somewhere along the way he decided he’d make a better cat than a dog. Wise decision. The dog, though, was happy to stay a dog. The cat who raised her had, I swear, a special call just for her and she’d come rushing over and clean his ears. They really were sweet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ya I could see a dog wanting to stay a dog. I bet the cat did have a special call and of course the dog, naturally wanting to please, would joyfully respond. How adorable! :-)
LikeLiked by 1 person
The British government is currently under a false illusion that problems can be solved by simply changing reporting and organisational structures. Examples are Police Services (Police and Crime Commissioners), Local Government (Elected Mayors), The NHS (constant reorganisation), Education (Academy Schools). They may never realise that re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic did not compensate for bad management.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d love to say something amusing about that but I’m too damn angry.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Boaty McBoatface: an update | Notes from the U.K.
I have 700 posts to read, but I’m not reading any of them except this one. I was so disappointed when they said no. I bust a gut when I first heard “Boaty McBoatface” on the news. It still cracks me up. ahahahahahahaha
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll save you looking at even more posts: When they announced that they were going to call the ship the David Attenborough, a Guardian letter writer suggested that he change his name to Boaty McBoatface. It would solve the whole problem.
I just love the Guardian letter writers. Some of them are inspiringly insane.
LikeLike
hahaha!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Restoring a country’s greatness: bell ringers, royal yachts, and low self-esteem | Notes from the U.K.
Pingback: Breaking news: Trainy McTrainface meets the public | Notes from the U.K.
Somebody didn’t think this through. I love the name: Boaty Mcboatface.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mmmmm hmmm. There’s nothing like getting a whole bunch of people excited about voting and then telling them you don’t care what they think.
LikeLike
Pingback: Updates from the British press | Notes from the U.K.
Pingback: Things that actually happen in Britain | Notes from the U.K.