It gets weirder over here by the minute. First, the House of Commons passed Boris Johnson’s Brexit bill. Only that wasn’t a decisive vote. It was the bill’s second reading, which is (the name’s a bit misleading) the first chance the Commons gets to debate a bill. If a bill passes the second reading, all that means is that the Commons approves the general principle of a bill, and then–at least in any normal situation–it goes to a committee, which considers all the clauses, the amendments, the commas, the footnotes, and the implications. Then the Commons can make a more informed decision.
But Johnson was demanding that the bill go through all its stages in three days, one of which had already been mostly used up, so it was second hand by the time the schedule was put to a vote. Commons would have to forget the commas, the clauses, the 110 pages of text, the fact that the chancellor had refused to issue any prediction about the agreement’s economic impact. To keep up with the schedule, the bill needed to leave the ball before the horses turned into mice and the coach turned into a pumpkin.
Why? Because Johnson said Britain would be out of the EU by Halloween and he had his sizeable ego caught up in this thing. Which is convenient, since it gives me a headline.
We’ll cut to the chase here. After the bill passed its second reading, the commons voted down his timetable, at which point Johnson said he’d withdraw the bill and call for an election. Then he said he’d pause the bill but Britain would still leave by October 31.
He also said he’d talk to EU leaders about an extension–preferably a short one. Donald Tusk, the EU council president, has said he’ll recommend a three-month extension that can end earlier if a deal is finally completed.
Do we have an election coming up? Hard to say. Johnson would love to leave the ball right now, if only to return with a new dress, two slippers, and a mandate. Do you know how awkward it is to run around in one high-heeled slipper, especially a glass one with no flexibility? On the other hand, he may think he can get his deal through, in which case he’ll want to do that first.
Will Labour support an election? Possibly. The experts are still reading the tea leaves on that.
Most predictions are that any election would return another deeply divided parliament, but I wouldn’t recommend putting money on any of this.
They’ll just do what they always do – bring us to stalemate, call an election, lose said election so the opposition become the government; then the former government – now the opposition – blame the government for getting us into this mess – and everyone believes them! The clowns really ARE running the circus.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Personally, I’d love to see the opposition become the government and–if it keeps its promises–but an end to the endless privatization we’ve had and get some funding back to local services and the NHS. But I don’t think the votes are there.
LikeLiked by 4 people
That’s relentless media spin for you. :-/
LikeLiked by 3 people
I know you don’t like Boris because you keep calling him ‘Johnson ‘ which nobody else does, and sets my teeth on edge. My instinctive feeling about Boris is that he is what we need, right now, for all his eccentricities. I don’t care, frankly, about the size of his ego. Can you think of a male national leader without an ego? That’s what makes men Men And leaders Leaders.
We had Mrs May who, if she had any ego, or indeed personality, hid it so well that she got stomped all over and shat upon.
My own feeling, though nowadays nothing can be predicted, is that if the actual People – as opposed to the hypothetical British People politicians are so fond of speaking for – do finally – finally! – get a chance to vote in a general election, the opposition may find themselves far less popular than they imagine, especially if the loathsome Old Goat remains.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Elections are notoriously hard to predict, especially lately, when pollsters have been unusually unreliable. I have no idea what’s going to happen, but my gut instinct is that it will, again, be a divided parliament. We’ll see, eventually.
About names. I know he’s generally called Boris. Sorry calling him by his last name doesn’t sit well with you, but Boris feels roughly that same to me. Theresa May was often called Mrs. May. I preferred May, as Corbyn’s Corbyn and Cameron was Cameron. If nothing else, at least it’s consistent. I’d agree about egos. It’s only when they get to be a problem that I think they’re worth mentioning. These people aren’t our friends and don’t have to be, so I’d judge them by different standards than the people I hope to spend time with. I mention Johnson’s (sorry) because in this case I think it is getting in his way. He made a rash commitment and is having trouble backing off it, although it would, I think, give him far fewer problems if he could adjust.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Bonkers Boris, bonkers Brexit and bonkers Britain. If the past 3 years were a novel you’d throw it in the bin for being unbelievably bonkers.
LikeLiked by 3 people
It’s true. You can get away with so much more in reality than you can in fiction.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“But Johnson was demanding that the bill go through all its stages in three days…Commons would have to forget the commas, the clauses, the 110 pages of text”
Rank amateurs. When Obama and the Dems passed healthcare they insisted the 2,500 pages be vote on sight unseen, because they didn’t have enough time to print all of the required copies before the date they wanted it voted upon.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Having left the country before Obama took office, I didn’t follow the details on the process. I’m going to have to take your word on it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh, the trend continues. Nobody bothered to actually READ the Mueller report, either – and I believe that was only 400 pages.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Did they eventually release the thing?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it’s available online. They released it, the AG lied and said it showed Trump was innocent, and very few people bothered to read it. Those who did read it challenged the AG, and the Trumpkins yelled at them for not being able to get over losing the election, also Hillary’s emails. Several members of the press read it and wrote about it, but then the House of Representatives insisted that Mueller stand up and testify, and the press lost interest in what he had to say and focused on how badly he said it. Because this is America and the important thing is the skin, not the substance.
Makes me tired.
Anyway, if you want to see it, ask Google. It’s somewhat redacted but it’s there.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks. I’m not sure I’ve got the energy for it, although if I was a better person I would.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I thought that I read that the ACA was debated in three House committees and two Senate committees, and subject to hours of bipartisan debate that allowed for the introduction of amendments.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the comment. It’s not a process I followed so I was at a loss there.
LikeLike
‘his sizeable ego caught up in this thing’…..why should this conjure up an image of Johnson with his genitalia caught in a mangle a la Widow Twankey? An image which a cup of Earl Grey and a severe talking to have failed to dispel.
LikeLiked by 5 people
The image did come to mind (as did the American phrase, “You really got your tit in a wringer this time”) but I thought I might do everyone a favor and leave it out.
However, I’m kind of glad to have someone else bring it up.
LikeLiked by 4 people
You can rely on me for the necessary unashamed vulgarity.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Then I hope you feel at home here. You should.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Oh my … if only! Thank you for that – it’s the first bit about this farce that’s made me actually LOL.
LikeLiked by 3 people
My parents should never have taken me to the pantomime…..
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you for a wonderful image! Can you give us an equally satisfying one for Trump?
LikeLiked by 4 people
Nothing about Trump inspires me….unfortunately.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Knowing that Johnson is a liar and breaks his promises, the one I’m hoping he does keep involves him and a ditch, next Thursday 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not long after he said that, folks on Twitter had a lot of fun photoshopping all sorts of things, including the reclincing Rees-Mogg, into a ditch.
LikeLiked by 2 people
They still are. I saw one this morning: a pair of hands, with jacket and shirt cuffs, poking out of the water in a ditch, with the caption ‘are you alright, Boris?’
LikeLiked by 2 people
Similar feelings here in re : Trump’s inquiry being “a lynching.” Would that some of his white-hooded pals would show up and give him the true version of one !
LikeLiked by 3 people
At least now he has discussed affirmatively asking for an extension, even s short one. That is some progress.
How long does it take to have new elections and form a new government. Does not seem to be time for that. Seems like the people in office should make the decision considering that midnight is approaching.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Compared to the US, elections take no time at all–and less money’s poured into them, although the faster they’re set up (I read recently) the more it costs local governments to rent places where people can vote. I’m not really sure what the minimum amount of time it, now that you ask.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In my opinion, in a representative democracy, the elected representatives make the decisions, doing what they think is the right course for the country. It appears to me they should put on their big boy pants (or as someone says in England, their big girl blouses) and decide what is to be done.
LikeLiked by 3 people
One thing that’s been missing in this whole sad saga is any attempt to bring the two sides together and see if there’s anything that would satisfy both to at least some degree. Instead, it’s been rip up the floorboards and destroy the other side. Which is one reason we are where we are.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds much like what we are doing over here.
LikeLiked by 2 people
My sense–and I’m not sure of that I’ll be able to explain this coherently–is that in the US the two sides are more genuinely divided, in part by the long and bitter history of racism and in part by a long history of division over social programs–not to mention abortion and gay rights. In Britain, the last three are relatively minimal divisions. Racism’s alive and kicking, although very different, and in both countries the division over immigration’s sharp and real. But my sense is of a less divided country, with a division being cooked up for political benefit. People feel–justifiably–unrepresented and are being represented by people who will do nothing in their interest.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You have my total sympathy. Insanity.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Mr Johnson is doing his best in a difficult political situation. If there is an element which seems very likely, Mr Johnson is likely to win. This not totally sure as we saw in Canada only a few days ago. After this event hopefully we will have a move forward. Would you not agree?
LikeLiked by 3 people
If the polls are right–which isn’t a sure thing–the Conservatives would be the largest party in a new parliament but would be well short of a majority. I don’t know if Johnson’s doing his best, but I don’t think that matters. In my opinion, his best isn’t what’s needed right now. Someone else might be able to find workable compromises–something neither he nor Theresa May have had any inclination to try.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Both May and Johnson have signed up to deals which leave the U.K. subject to E.U. legislation in the long term…disagrements to be adjudicated by….the E.C.J. and a body appointed by the E.U.
You cannot compromise with the E.U. if you want independence. I know it is not a popular view…and I am no longer living there…but a no deal stance is the only one which will bring results and allow the U.K. to revitalise its infrstructure and its industrial sector.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have to disagree with you there. I think what a hard Brexit would set off would be a race to the bottom–the elimination of workplace, consumer, environmental, and human rights protections. The cost money, all of them. And as a writer in I can’t remember which newspaper reminded us recently, even a no-deal Brexit will involve deals–you can’t be part of the world economy without them–but they’ll be negotiated later.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, the no deal is with the E.U. and it is only a race to the bottom if people are mad enough to re elect the Tories.
As the CAA showed in the Thomas Cook debacle, we have people capable of making decisions, but the problem seems to be the incompetent politicians.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And they may well be mad enough.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Why? Because Johnson said Britain would be out of the EU by Halloween and he had his sizeable ego caught up in this thing. Which is convenient, since it gives me a headline.” 😂😂😂 Loving this turn of phrase… and loved the title.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks. Having to find variations for the title keeps reminding me to find something fun in this mess.
LikeLiked by 2 people
So, this whole thing, the people said they want this? Is that correct?
LikeLiked by 2 people
We-e-ll, Brexit got a majority in a referendum. But it was one of those badly worded monsters that leaves everybody wondering what exactly the majority voted for. A no-deal Brexit? A soft Brexit that leaves us in the customs union? Any one of a number of variations in between? No one knows, and an awful lot of people are happy to jump in and claim that the yes vote was for the variation that they happen to support.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I see. That makes sense. Not the process, your answer. Just to be clear.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nicely rounded-up. Good thing none of us are holding our breaths awaiting the outcome is all I can add. I’m beyond knowing whether to laugh or cry …
LikeLiked by 2 people
Or both. At the same time.
LikeLiked by 2 people
maybe we could el Presidente your way to straighten out Parliament.
Nah. We like the UK.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Kind of you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
well, I’m here to help you and Wild Thing. ;-)
LikeLiked by 2 people
I am beyond words.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I too refuse to call him Boris. PM Johnson it is.
The first name term feeds in to the mythological character that he has propogated over time, the bumbling, not serious or prepared enough to be dangerous buffoon. The image created to distract you from the actual Alexander Boris dePfeffel Johnson, the old Etonian ‘he didn’t get to where he is by actually being any good at anything’ man himself. A chancer and a liar but with family generated connections.
In fact, his (failed) intended avoidance of this ‘deal’ being looked at too closely smacked of a second-hand car salesman showing you the gleaming paint job and trying deparately to close the deal but avoiding any discussion of the mechanical condition under the hood and just plain lying about the lack of a service history.
People see through the ‘you can trust me, I’m just harmless old bumbling Boris’ now. Mainly.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Or partly. I think it’s a long way from universal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you summarised that very well, Ellen. Don’t forget the anti-Brexit march last Saturday, the biggest march in UK History, ever?!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Right. I’m not sure how I managed to lose that many people. Apologies.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I can’t really get a thorough picture of Boris Johnson. Is he a bumbling idiot like Trump? Or is he smart and just refuses to play by any rules, sense of decorum, etc.
LikeLiked by 2 people
My sense is that he’s smarter than Trump–talk about damning with faint praise–but nowhere near as smart as he thinks he is. He’s the product of elite education, and an elite family, all of which tends to convince people that they’re smarter than they are. He’s also cultivated an image as a bumbling rule breaker and manages to get away, shamelessly, with things that would drive anyone else out of public office. His closest adviser, Dominic Cummings, is a master of the dark arts of campaigning but hasn’t been as clever at actual politics. Is that any help?
LikeLiked by 1 person
A modicum of good news here (Canada) … we now have a minority government, which will, if nothing else force the parties to at least pretend to communicate effectively with each other and focus slightly more on each issue rather than the usual dick-wankery. It’s the best we could hope for really.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Let’s hope they can do it instead of going into gridlock.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wouldn’t that be … novel. :)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Follow back:)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sorry, I don’t do follow-me-and-I’ll-follow-you. Follow if you want to read the posts. If you don’t, why fill up your inbox with junk you don’t care about?
LikeLike
That is true indeed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you understand.
LikeLike
Ellen, I appreciate your Brexit posts. Thanks for keeping us informed. and Thanks for linking up with us at the GATHER OF FRIENDS LINK PARTY 9. Pinned
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much for doing that. I’ve never been able to make much sense of Pinterest. (I tried briefly, then fled.) I can see where it works for crafts and travel and things of that sort. But what on earth category would you use for something like the Brexit posts?
LikeLike