Cornwall’s Prayerbook Rebellion

It’s 1549, we’re in Cornwall, and (I’m taking a gamble here) none of us speak the language, because it isn’t English, it’s Cornish. Enough people speak English that we can probably buy a loaf of bread and a pint of beer (we’ll want to stay away from the water), but it’s embarrassing to depend on other people being better at languages than we are.

 

The inevitable background

What else do we need to know? Edward the Kid is on the English throne. That makes him sound more like a wild west gunslinger than a monarch, though, so let’s be conventional enough to call him Edward VI. He won’t last long–he becomes king at 9 and dies of TB at 15–but right now he’s sitting in the fancy chair, and he’s seriously, Protestantly Protestant, and more to the point, so are the people around him who, since he really is a kid, are powerful forces. 

This is when (and why) crucifixes and saints’ images are stripped out of the churches. Stained glass is destroyed. Masses for the dead are banned, and so are rosaries and church processions. The clergy’s gotten permission to marry.

But in Cornwall it’s gone further than that. Churches can’t ring bells for the dead. Church ales–fundraising banquets that are one of the important ways local churches raise money–have been banned. Priests’ vestments have to meet strict guidelines, and parishioners have to pay for that. 

Irrelevant photo: A magnolia blossom. For some reasons, it decided to bloom a second time this summer

These West Country rules come from William Body, who (I’m quoting David Horspool’s The English Rebel here) “got his hands on the archdeaconry of Cornwall against local opposition,” and then managed to line his pockets once he did.

In Penryn two years ago (that was 1547), there was a demonstration against him and the changes he’d introduced. It came off peacefully, and so did the government’s response. 

But the next year, the foundations that sang masses for the dead were suppressed, and in Helston Body was attacked and murdered by a mob led by a priest. 

Do I need to point out that this wasn’t peaceful? The priest and eleven other people were executed. This wasn’t a peaceful response.

Aren’t you glad I’m here to tell you these things?

Still, Edward, his advisors, or a combination thereof, didn’t think the opposition meant much. It happened in Cornwall, for fuck’s sake–the outer edges of beyond. They were convinced that people were thirsty for their reforms, but even if they’d believed the opposite, they might have acted the same way. Because they were right. It said so in their holy book, or it did once someone put the correct interpretation on it. So they moved ahead and introduced a major change in church services: they’d now be in English instead of Latin, and they’d follow the Book of Common Prayer

The Latin mass was now an endangered species, and if you insisted on saying it you’d be endangered yourself.

And since we’ve caught up with our timeline, we’ll shift back to the present tense. It almost makes sense if you don’t think about it too hard.

Conducting church services in a language people understand is a very Protestant move, and the English church has been edging in this direction for a while, first including snippets of English, then tolerating–maybe even encouraging–English-only masses in a few churches. Now, though, every last church has to use the Book of Common Prayer, and nope, they’re not negotiating this.

This sets off a massive flap. Catholics cling to Latin, and they’re horrified. But people who are further along the Protestant spectrum are equally offended because the Book of Common Prayer doesn’t break as sharply as they’d like with Catholicism. 

And–we’re finally getting to the point here–it offends the Cornish, because say what you like about how a service in the language people actually speak brings religion closer to the people, English isn’t their damn language and their priests can’t say services in Cornish because that’s not how it’s being done this week.

I’m not sure anyone wanted to say the service in Cornish, mind you. I’m just pointing out that the compromise wasn’t on the table. The Act of Uniformity bans every language except English from church services.

 

Cue the rebellion, please 

We’ll start in Bodmin, which is more or less the geographical center of Cornwall. It’s the first day the new services are scheduled to be heard. So people gather. People protest. They convince a local member of the gentry, Humphrey Arundell, to lead them.

Yes, I do notice the strangeness of people having to convince someone to lead them. It speaks, I think, to how deeply ingrained the hierarchy is. Without a gentleman to lead them, how could they possibly know what to do, even if they had to set him up there and tell him to do it?

Instead of going home at the end of the event, the protesters set up camp.

On the same day and for the same reasons, a protest breaks out in Sampford Courtenay, in Devon, the next county up from Cornwall, and nine days later the two groups set up camp a few miles outside Exeter and prepare to lay siege to the city. Figure there are some 2,000 rebels out there. Or some 4,000. Let’s not bog down over the details. A lot of people. More than you’d want at your birthday party.

The rebels put together several versions of their demands, and most of what they want is about religion. The center of religious reformation is in London. In the West Country, they hold to the beliefs and traditions that have been part of daily life for centuries. Still, they don’t call for a full return to the Catholic Church but to a return to the way things were under Henry VIII. And like so many rebels in monarchical countries, they don’t see themselves as challenging the king but the bad counselors around him. 

Yes, everybody’s drunk the monarchical KoolAid. It won’t be until the Civil War that they turn to other drinks.

The siege of Exeter lasts five or six weeks, and Exeter is left to defend itself until John Russell, who just happens to be the Lord Privy Seal (and people take these titles entirely seriously, remember) arrives with soldiers and defeats the rebels.

Estimates of the number of rebel dead are roughly the same as the estimates of the rebels themselves: 3,000 to 4,000. 

Again, don’t try too hard to make the numbers work. The leaders are hauled to London to be ritually hanged, drawn, and quartered. 

 

The aftermath

As a BBC historical article puts it, “The insurrection was eventually crushed with hideous slaughter – some three to four thousand West Country men were killed – and in its wake the ruling classes may well have come to associate the Cornish tongue with rebellion and sedition, as well as with poverty and ‘backwardness’. This in turn may help to explain why the Book of Common Prayer was never translated into Cornish, as it was later to be translated into Welsh. What is certain is that the failure to provide a liturgy in the Cornish tongue did much to hasten the subsequent decline of the language.”

The decline is more or less geographical, with English leaking across the Devon border and pouring south and west. By 1640, Cornish has retreated into the toe of Cornwall’s sock, and as the language dies out, the process of assimilation into England gathers force. By 1700, only 5,000 people speak Cornish.

The last native speaker of Cornish is Dolly Pentreath, who’s born in 1685 and dies in 1777

But. The sense of separation stays strong and plays a role in Cornwall taking the royalist side in the Civil Wars–partly (or so the BBC article speculates) because they saw Charles as  British and the Parliamentarians as English. With his defeat, the Cornish identity took another hit.

17 thoughts on “Cornwall’s Prayerbook Rebellion

  1. Linguistic equality is a big deal, but nobody bar the Esperantists seems to think it is. They argue that a lot of smaller languages would survive (and every language contains a culture), if only we would use Esperanto as an easily learned second language for international cooperation, instead of being rolled over by the English behemoth.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I admire the ideals of the Esperantists but I can’t say I’ve been impressed by their solution. Given how seldom things work out as planned, I could see an artificially created international language rolling over smaller languages as surely as the organically created languages of the imperial powers have. But I do agree with you–every language contains a culture (well put), and linguistic equality is indeed a big deal.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Ellen, all I can say is, I wish you had been my history teacher in high school. I would have loved history, any history, the way you would have taught it. I really had no interest in Cornwall anything, but read your post word for word, and enjoyed it. How are you doing? 📚🎶 Christine

    Liked by 1 person

  3. “The last native speaker of the Cornish language died in 1777…” There are groups of people today trying to preserve their language while there are still some elder who can speak it…Finding out that a main part of what is now the UK lost its last native speaker all those years ago makes that even more poignant. I will remember that the next time I encounter some place names in Gaelic or Welsh. Thanks for making it relevant !

    Liked by 1 person

    • Knowing that languages, and all the riches they carry, get lost, yes, it’s moving to know that people are working to keep languages from being lost entirely. I know that in New Zealand Maori is making a comeback. Some regional distinctions have been lost, but the language overall is taking hold of a younger generation and as far as I can tell seems to be gaining strength. It’s heartening.

      Like

  4. It all went downhill when mass was not longer said in Latin. These “nationalists” are bloody botchers re ruling, just “one nation” is soo limited.
    One language, one prayer, worldwide – that is ruling ! Makes no difference whether you go into THE church in Manila, Madrid or Something-with-M-in-the-godless-US.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Godless? The US is over-godded these days–at least in my opinion. In the name of freedom of religion, Christian zealots want everyone to follow their religion.

      That’s freedom, right?

      For an M in the US, Minneapolis will do. But look out for the winter. They’ll freeze the Latin right out of your brain.

      Like

      • What I see in the US regarding “GOd”, and its worldly deputies, is something I can not describe in words. The picture of these “people” putting their hands on (that is : blessing (!) this “president” is disgusting on many levels. So much for the separation of state and church. I think that some parts of “the South” are fundamentalistic tribal societies where “enlightenment” is a bad word, and rabbi Jesus would be crucified again for preaching rebellion. Anyway, it may all be different, and all happily suck their plastic Jesus.

        Liked by 1 person

        • The South’s got a bigger reputation for religion but it’s not limited to the South. For as long as I remember–and I’m a thousand or so years old–politicians had to at least make a pretence of religion, and it had damn well better be Christian. And preferably Protestant. In recent years, it’s all gotten much more aggressive.

          Like

  5. Considering that the spark that set off the Civil Wars was Charles I’s insistene on uniformity in Scotland, including the imposition of the Anglican Book of Common Prayer – an ironic choice of sides for the Cornish to take, perhaps.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I’ve often wondered why they ended up on the Royalist side. The idea that they saw the Parliamentarians as English borders on making sense of that to me, but it doesn’t get me all the way there.

      Like

Leave a reply to cat9984 Cancel reply