Immigration and the Windrush story

When you read the history of Black immigration to Britain, you’ll find the story of the Windrush looming large.

The story of what?

A ship called the Empire Windrush. It docked in Essex (that’s in England; you’re welcome) in 1948, bringing immigrants from the West Indies–and also from other places, including Poland, but only the West Indian immigrants became part of the story. Think of the story as a paper bag full of groceries. The bottom got wet and everyone else fell. They haven’t been seen since. Sorry.

The Windrush gave its name to a generation, not because it was the first ship to bring immigrants from the West Indies but because it was the first to arrive after the passage of the British Nationality Act, which gave people from the colonies the right to live and work in Britain. 

History’s funny like that. A few events get to be fixed points in the story while other things, things that happened before, after, and around those fixed points, go missing. They’re hanging out with those Polish immigrants at the Invisibility Cafe and they’ll be there until a new generation of historians comes along to resurrect them.

Irrelevant photo: Geraniums hanging out with a California poppy.

 

Postwar Britain

Britain came out of World War II exhausted, heavily bombed, and damn near broke. Wartime food rationing continued well into peacetime. To reconstruct, the country needed a lot of things, including workers. Some 260,000 British soldiers had died in the war. (That doesn’t count troops from the colonies, just the ones from Britain itself.) And when after the war some half a million migrants left Britain for the colonies to build new lives, Winston Churchill, by then a mere former prime minister, begged them to stay, saying “We cannot spare you.” 

To which they replied, in unison, “Your problem, buddy,” and off they toddled.

The government turned to its colonies, where they hoped to recruit workers who already spoke English from places where labor was cheap. 

Yes, it was all entirely high minded.

The West Indies were a prime target, since they were struggling economically, and West Indians responded, taking took jobs as manual workers, drivers, cleaners, and nurses, although when I took the Life in the UK test (you have to pass to get indefinite leave to remain), what I had to memorize was that they became bus drivers. Every last one of them.

Listen, when you have to pass a standardized test, you give ‘em what they want, no matter how strained its relationship to fact may be.

People from other colonies also took up the offer, but they too have dropped out of the story. If you want to know more about them, there’s this cafe I can recommend.

 

The welcome mat

So Britain put out the welcome mat, right? 

Sure it did. And the sun shone on this rainy island for 365 days straight. 

What happened was the usual hysteria about immigrants, because the thing about immigrants is that they’re from other countries. Where they do things differently. You know how it works: the country they come to may be divided against itself in six different ways, but drop in enough foreigners to hit critical mass and the country discovers it dislikes them  more than it dislikes its fellow countryfolk.

Sorry, I don’t mean to sound as cynical as I sound. It just sort of happens sometimes. 

Once you’ve cued up the usual hysteria, you can multiply it by the fact that the immigrants were Black and Britain was still overwhelmingly white. 

Result? As much as the country needed workers, jobs were mysteriously hard to find. One man from the Windrush generation said, “Apparently I was always just a few hours too late,” although they were so polite about it that he added, “The Englishman can be the nicest man out when he is telling you no.”    

Housing was equally hard to find. Rooms for rent were generally advertised on notices in the windows of local stores, and a lot of notices said, “No blacks.” Or in some cases, “No blacks, no Irish, no dogs.” 

Yes, kiddies, Irish and Black people were bundled into such a tight package that it was hard to tell them apart. In the rest of this paragraph I’ll be working from memory, so give me some leeway, but Ireland was the place where Britain honed its skills in justifying imperial conquest. It learned to write a story that showed the conquered people as a separate race, so incompetent, so inferior, that conquering them was damn near doing them a favor. In that contest, wrapping them all up together made a kind of sense. 

The things you learn, right?

Maybe the atmosphere of those early years is best summed up by a quick visit to MP Enoch Powell’s 1968 Rivers of Blood speech in Parliament. By then, hundreds of thousands of commonwealth immigrants had moved to Britain.

In a decade or so, he said, “the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.”

And it wasn’t just the immigrants he was talking about but their descendants, They’d erode the national character. He talked about a constituent who wouldn’t rent rooms to Black people. 

“She is becoming afraid to go out,” he said. “Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letter box. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies.

“They cannot speak English, but one word they know. ‘Racialist,’ they chant.”

He was trying to defeat the Race Relations Bill, and the speech was so over the top that it ended his political career. The bill passed, making race-based discrimination illegal. But the speech did succeed in cranking up antagonism against Black people, so multiply the anti-immigrant hysteria by twelve if you would and write your answer at the bottom of your test paper and leave it in the trash can on your way out. Thank you. Everybody gets an A.

Thousands of people turned out onto the streets protesting Powell. And thousands turned out in support. 

The speech has found echoes in a recent speech by the current prime minister, Keir Starmer, who warned that immigration would make us “an island of strangers.” The speech was somewhat less hysterical but was still full of talk about uncontrolled immigration and incalculable damage to British society.

Starmer’s favorability rating is now – 46. (He’s Labour.) His most vocal opponent–the right-wing voice he’s trying to out-right-wing–is Nigel Farage (Reform), whose favorability rating is -26. Kemi Badenoch (Conservatives) is at – 39. That leaves Ed Davey (Liberal Democrats) at – 8 the clear winner.  

I’d love to explain how those ratings are calculated, but it involves numbers and we’ll all be better off if I don’t try. What we really need to know is that (a) a minus rating isn’t good, and (b) if you want everyone to love you, British politics isn’t the right place for you just now.

 

The Windrush Scandal

But back to our story. The immigrants landed, they worked, they built lives and families. Those who had children back home brought them over once they were settled. The country rebuilt, and–

Do you remember how people in Britain clapped for essential workers during lockdown? Essential workers were the people risking their lives, generally for low pay, to keep the rest of us fed and to keep the lights on, the hospitals running, and the trash collected. Once a week, we acknowledged how much we depended on them, then lockdown ended and the world forgot about them. Did they get a raise? The hell they did. The only visibility they have now is that at our local supermarket the people who round up the shopping carts–or trolleys if we’re talking British–still wear vests (or in British, gillets) with some slogan about essential workers. Probably because the store doesn’t want to spend money on replacing them. 

That was a longish digression, but if you subtract the clapping and the acknowledgement, that’s what happened to the Windrush generation, but again you’ll need to multiply it by twelve. 

Or possibly more than twelve, because in 2012, in the midst of a new wave of hysteria about immigrants, the government introduced a “hostile environment for illegal immigrants.” Landlords had to check a potential tenant’s right to be in the country; employers had to do the same; so did the National Health Service. Bank account? Ditto. Local government couldn’t offer support to people unless they could prove their right to be in the country. 

And guess what: a significant portion of the Windrush generation couldn’t prove its right to be in the country. Not because they’d done anything wrong but because the government hadn’t kept a record of who’d been granted the right to remain. They’d never issued the paperwork people needed to document their status and in 2010 they’d destroyed the landing cards that would’ve documented their arrival. 

Many of the people needing those documents had arrived as children, traveling on their parents’ passports, giving them one less document to rely on. 

Overnight a swathe of people who arrived legally became, officially speaking, illegal immigrants. People lost their housing, their jobs, their driving licenses, their bank accounts, their access to healthcare. Some were deported to countries they no longer remembered. Some were detained within Britain as illegal immigrants. 

As the scandal became public and individual stories emerged, assorted politicians made all the appropriate noises and in 2019 reparations were promised. In 2021, a committee of MPs found that the system of compensating people was so torturous that applying for compensation had become another source of trauma. The Home Office was and still is in charge of the process, which leaves it investigating its own fuck-ups, and many of the people who should get compensation are, not unreasonably, afraid to make themselves known. Some 15,000 people are thought to be eligible for compensation. As of February 2024, 2,307 claims had been accepted. 

The people who have applied have faced long delays, and this is a group of elderly people, and the thing about elderly people is that we keep getting older. If the government stalls this group long enough–apologies for reminding you–they’ll start to die off. We all do that sooner or later.

Many cases that are denied are overturned on appeal, but that depends on being able to launch an appeal.

Is free legal advice available? Don’t kid yourself.

I think it’s fair to say that when compensation has been given, it doesn’t match the wreckage that was made of the recipient’s life. One man who was deported ended up living on the streets in Jamaica for ten years. He’s only just been promised a return, although his case hit the newspapers months ago. Whether he’s actually been brought home yet I don’t know.

What sort of compensation makes up for that?

26 thoughts on “Immigration and the Windrush story

    • I did. And was told it wasn’t commercially viable. Too episodic, I suspect, on top of me having zero credentials as a historian. I should try again one of these days. Thanks for giving me a shove.

      Like

  1. Thank you for this history lesson. I am a ‘baby boomer’, and in the last few years I have discovered that at school I was given a skewed view of the world. I am not proud to be British, but I am very privileged to have been born here.
    Keep ’em coming!

    Liked by 2 people

    • We’re in the same generation, and the history I was taught in the US was unbalanced, not to mention sometimes just plain wrong and at other times incomprehensible. You have to admire the collection of minds that could take a subject as fascinating as history and make it so monumentally boring.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Not to belittle the Windrush scandal (and it makes me ashamed to be British) isn’t the universal truth that governments of any persuasion always drag their feet when it comes to compensation? (Think haemophiliacs, women pensioners of a certain age etc.) I’m sure it’s no different elsewhere, just do everything slowly enough and the claimants will die…

        Liked by 2 people

        • I can’t think of any example to counter what you’ve said.

          What I would add, though, is that I don’t think anyone should be ashamed of their nationality–and I’m originally from the US, which has plenty to answer for. For one thing, it doesn’t help and I suspect it does some harm. From the disasters of our history we inherit a responsibility to speak out, to do what we can to change things, but that’s as far as I think it goes.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Maybe I should have said embarrassed rather than ashamed. No country, no system, no government is perfect. After all, they’re human constructs and we can’t and don’t do perfect. And all of history, ancient and contemporary, just shows how limited is the power of the individual. For every Ghandi, there are thousands, if not millions, who fail, overcome by chicanery, indifference, time or the sheer effort needed. Which isn’t an excuse to do nothing, just don’t expect much.

            Liked by 1 person

  2. Ye Gods – this reads like the history of the Yew Ess of A and what is continuing over here to an amazing degree. How scary and discouraging is that ? Plus we seem headed to a monarchy not as low-key as yours.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. I thought I had decent general knowledge about the Windrush, its impact and significance, but you’ve yet again managed to educate me because I never knew there were immigrants from anywhere other than the West Indies aboard the ship. What happened to the immigrants decades ago was atrocious and the fact they then had to experience yet hostility in recent years serves to illustrate how systemic racism stands the test of time.

    Liked by 3 people

    • It’s amazing, isn’t it, how many ways a system of discrimination embeds itself into a system? (Oh, horrors! I’m dancing on the edge of critical race theory, aren’t I? Good thing I framed all that as questions.) I was surprised that other groups of people were on the ship as well. And although I didn’t find a place to include it, the papers focused on it carrying a large group of Jamaican men (presumably because their readers would find that frightening), there were also Jamaican women and both men and women from the other islands.

      Liked by 1 person

    • That’s an interesting question and I’d love to know the answer. I hope so.

      After this posted (and I haven’t gone back to change it), it occurred to me that panic about refugees isn’t just about people arriving with different languages, different skin tones, different customs. In the 1930s, a section of the US had a horrendous drought and killing dust storms, and people picked up and headed west, to California, where they were anything but welcome. They were called Okies, although the didn’t all come from Oklahoma. They were white (as far as I know) and from the same country, but they were poor and desperate and from someplace that wasn’t California. That was enough to make them despised.

      Liked by 1 person

    • As a blogger, I probably shouldn’t say this, but I don’t look to bloggers for my news. Having said that, yeah, the news is showing us dark times in pretty much every corner of the globe, and because the US is my original home, what’s happening there particularly scares me.

      Like

  4. I did not follow this story back in the days, so I did not know that immigrants were actually deported.
    Destroy the files first … Someone in a departement had a very relaxed attitude towards files, who needs that paper anyway ?

    Liked by 2 people

    • In these days when so much is saved online or in some computer’s memory banks, I expect that attitude’s not uncommon. I mean, look at that! It takes up space. It gathers dust. It’s old. Who needs it? It would be easy to believe it was done with intent, but I don’t have any problem believing it was stupidity. It never pays to underestimate the likelihood of stupidity.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. It is somewhat amazing to me that ‘Christian Nations’ tend to be the least ‘Christian’ in their actions with immigrants. Read your Bibles, it can be summarized by how the locals mistreated the immigrants. Jesus himself was an immigrant, as were the Apostles. How can we read any of that book and not understand how it outlined how not to treat peoples crossing borders. And yet, we trudge along trying to justify stories like this still going on today. Thanks for posting this terrific read!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks for that. I’ve begun to think that there’s no idea so good and so pure that it can’t be screwed up in practice. So many religions either start out with fine and noble beliefs, or at least have strands that are. Then the real world gets hold of them and those are saved for times when they don’t have to be put into practice. I don’t know what it’s going to take for us to do better, but I’m pretty sure that if we don’t figure that out pretty quickly we as a species won’t do particularly well.

      Sorry. I got a little grim on you there, didn’t I? It’s so close to the surface these days. But anyway, thanks for the praise. Much appreciated.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I have days where I feel so discouraged about the current state of affairs, but today I feel more optimistic. I’m not sure why, but I feel that we all need to stand up for immigrants, refugees, homeless in our midst. We all come from this same stock of people, and we all contribute to the strength of our nation. If these two political parties need to be tossed out to bring our nation to respect life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all… let’s get it done!!! 🌈

        Liked by 1 person

        • I’m with you. We need to treat refugees the way we’d hope to be treated if we were in their position–if for no better reason than because no one ever knows when they will be. None of them planned to have their homelands torn apart. And immigrants? I’m the granddaughter of immigrants. I’m also an immigrant myself. The mixing of cultures brings richness and strength to a country. And we are all one species, as you say.

          Liked by 1 person

  6. No Windrush Scandal, its Home Office Scandal, we don’t want history to record a Windrush Scandal, UK Government cause the scandal, Historical Roots published September 2024.storical Roots, Garrick Prayogg Windrush Activist for Justice. The Narrative must be right.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I see your point, but given that the Home Office is full of scandals and has a new one coming up (they’ve “lost track” of 200,000 people with the right to remain), we do need names that will distinguish one scandal from the next from the one sitting right beside it.

      Like

Leave a reply to phantombrieflya4144284bf Cancel reply