We’re programmed to imagine early medieval England as a land of straw-haired Anglo-Saxons–so much so that an article debunking that belief is illustrated by (you guessed it) a picture of a straw-haired young woman wearing a leather headband and gazing soulfully up at the clouds.
But before I go on, let’s define the early medieval period. English Heritage opens the doors at around the year 410 and tossing the drinkers out onto the street in 1066, which means it runs from the end of Roman rule to the Norman invasion. You could call it the Anglo-Saxon period without losing too many points on your essay, even though what you’re about to read messes with the standing assumptions about Anglo-Saxon England. You could also call it the Dark Ages, but you’ll lose points. It’s got more zing but it’s gone out of fashion.
That straw-haired image
The stereotype we bought into–and forgive me if I pretend I can talk for all of us–grows out of having read that the Anglo-Saxons invaded that big central chunk of Britain we call England, pushing its earlier residents, the Celts, to the margins.
The margins? That’d be Scotland, Wales, and Cornwall.
Since the Anglo-Saxons were Germanic tribes, we can call Central Casting and tell them we need blonds–lots of tall, warrior types and a few wistful maidens.
Why the gender imbalance? Because we were taught the Anglo-Saxons came as warriors–big, blond guys with big, blond swords.
The archeologists who gave us that story did it in good faith. They were working with the tools they had. They’d dig up an early medieval village or graveyard, find Anglo-Saxon artifacts, and not unreasonably deduce that Anglo-Saxons lived there. But turn a few calendar pages and before we know what hit us, science has given them new toys to work with. In other words, the next generation of archeologists could work over the same ground but now sequence DNA and read tooth enamel well enough to identify people’s tribes and know where the tooth enamel- wearer had grown up, and that’s made the picture of early medieval England and the Anglo-Saxons more complicated.
The article that pushed me down the road toward this blog post opens (once you get past that blond-haired maiden) by questioning the assumption that everyone in early medieval English villages looked alike or talked the same way. It’s based on a DNA study of 460 people from sites across northern Europe, 278 of them from the southern and eastern English coasts.
The Anglo-Saxons and the Celts
The first change to the traditional story is that the Anglo-Saxons (or the incomers, anyway, whatever we’re going to call them) don’t seem to have driven the Celts out. Instead, the two groups settled down alongside them and played house: Many people in these settlements were of mixed heritage.
The study did find evidence of mass migration into the British Isles after Roman government ended, but it wasn’t a migration of warriors. These were families.
Now let’s shift to a different article. It’s about the same study but juggles a few different details. It doesn’t talk about Celts and Anglo-Saxons but people of WBI (western British and Irish) and CNE (continental northern European) heritage. If you want the percentages from various communities, that’s where you’ll find it. I hope you know better than to look to me for numbers when they’re avoidable.
But the genetic makeup of the communities wasn’t limited to Celts and northern Europeans. One skeleton–a girl of about eleven, found in Updown (yes, seriously), in Kent–had two-thirds CNE ancestry and one-third West African ancestry. The modern grouping most closely related to her African ancestors would be the Esan and Yoruba peoples in southern Nigeria.
How’d they show up there? Trade, probably. Early medieval England wasn’t an isolated place, ad traders often exchange more than just the goods they’re selling. They exchange culture, language, DNA.
Updown Girl was buried with her family members and with grave goods similar to theirs, like any other village girl, since that’s what she was, in a manner we still call Anglo-Saxon for lack of a better term.
Why am I looking for a better term? Because the culture we still think of as Anglo-Saxon and that we used to assume was brought over whole by the Anglo-Saxon tribes seems to have belonged to a hybrid culture–the kind that grows up when cultures meet and mix. We don’t know what that mixing was like; we can only infer it from DNA, tooth enamel, and the goods people were buried with.
Grave goods and social patterns
The second article says, “Grave goods seem to have played only a very limited role in the signalling of different ancestries–assuming that was what was intended–and where it is seen, that signalling was dependent on biological sex.” In other words, you can’t tell from the goods people were buried with who was of primarily CNE (or Anglo-Saxon) ancestry and who was primarily WBI (or Celtic), although men whose ancestry was primarily WBI–what we’d call mostly Celtic–were more likely to have been buried with grave goods primarily WBI than women were.
How come? Dunno. Any answer will be wild speculation. If I was writing historical fiction, I could have fun with that, although someone somewhere would inevitably think it was fact.
The archeologists found that the two groups–the WBI and the CNE–didn’t generally keep themselves separate and people soon had mixed ancestry. The patterns varied from settlement to settlement, but all of them change our assumptions of what Anglo-Saxon means. It’s beginning to look like a culture adopted by a group of genetically mixed people rather than something brought over whole by invading tribesmen.
As the first article–the one with the straw-haired maiden–puts it, “Early Anglo-Saxon culture was a mixing pot of ideas, intermarriage and movement. This genetic coalescing and cultural diversity created something new in the south and east of England after the Roman empire ended.”
For people who believe in racial purity, the science of DNA must be a real pain in the backside.
It’s interesting how the language that the Anglo-Saxons brought with them to Britain became the dominant language over the various Celtic languages and dialects.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The historian Susan Oosthuizen speculates (with some convincing–at least to me–reasons) that it may have become a contact language: one that’s used as a common language by people who speak many languages, which would’ve included various Celtic languages, spoken Latin, Church Latin, Pictish, and I forget what else. That means it would’ve picked up words from all of the above and what we now call the Anglo-Saxon language may well not have been the language the Anglo-Saxon tribes brought with them when they migrated. In fact, she considers it unlikely that they all spoke the same language.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve long wondered what Latin influences happened to the Celtic languages and early English during the four centuries of Roman colonization.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A lot of what I read talks about Romanized Celts, or the Romano-British. You have to wonder if the Celtic language(s) bent toward Latin or Latin toward them–or both.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ohhh, I love hellebores!
LikeLiked by 1 person
They are nice at this time of year.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you fancy a rest from Lord Goggle, there’s a book called Digging Up Britain by Mike Pitts that explores various archaeological sites in the light of the latest research that is both very readable and highly informative.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds like a perfect fit for my interests. Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know why we make such a fuss about it. As far back as I can go, which isn’t that far, but I can extrapolate, my family has lived on the south coast. The thing about coastal areas is that they tend to receive visitors from other countries. Sometimes they stay and sometimes they leave pregnant women behind. I have Celtic ancestors (red-headed family members), Saxon ancestors (no proof, but a good supposition given that I’m not far from the capital of Wessex), and Mediterranean blood (an inherited blood disorder that exists mainly in that part of the world). I ought to do one of those ‘find your ancestors’ tests.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And all my known ancestors are Jewish, but I’m running around with blue eyes, so my best guess is that some DNA swapping went on among my ancestors as well. I’m sure nobody out there is pure. I’d find the ancestor search fascinating, but I don’t think they’re all that reliable at this point. They depend very much on the sample they’re working from, which depends on who’s spent money to find their ancestors. I seem to remember reading about people sending samples to multiple companies and getting different results. Which is a shame, because it would be interesting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe I’ll wait, then.
The Saxons were also probably a mixture. I doubt that any of us with European roots is pure anything. I suspect that that’s true for everyone. People travelled and they mixed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They did both. Hell, if some of us have Neanderthal DNA, people did plenty of mixing way back when and I don’t think they’ve stopped since.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I was thinking about the Neanderthals.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wonder if those find-your-ancestor businesses will tell people if they have Neanderthal DNA. Now that would be interesting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wonder if they’re that sophisticated, but it would be interesting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I seriously doubt they are. I’m very skeptical about them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I let “updpwn” pass, but when you got to “Updown Girl…” I had to call timeout (to try to shed the earworm)
I think they have discovered evidence of people with Neanderthal DNA. (Read that somewhere and can’t cite it now). Latest info indicates the Neanderthals weren’t all t hat different – if you put a couple in modern clothes instead of animal skins you would not notice a big difference. Which i kind of reassuring and kind fof ironic (at least Over Here where Being White is becoming a big deal all over again,)
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s now pretty well accepted that many of us whose relatively recent origins lie outside of Africa (and I think Asia, but I can’t swear to that) have some Neanderthal DNA. And–isn’t this odd?–that coincides with a redrawing of Neanderthal images. Suddenly they walk fully upright, they don’t drag their knuckles, they look smarter, their impressive strength is acknowledged. Gee whiz, kids, these are ancestors we can be proud of. I wouldn’t be surprised if their skin’s gotten lighter too, but I don’t have before and after pictures, so I’m just guessing.
Yes, racism’s alive and well and living in entirely too many places.
Updown Girl’s one hell of a name. I’m a small-time collector of English place names and I’ve added Updown to Washaway and Pityme.
LikeLike
I read an article last year about how English grammar is actually Celtic, this indicating lots of intermarriage. Can’t find the one I read back then but here’s another: https://www.sameskylanguages.co.uk/post/the-celtic-influence-on-english
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oooh, thank you. I’ll check that out. I read something (and can’t find the reference) about Celtic and other words getting glued onto a Germanic syntax. But since I can’t find it, we might ought to treat that like a passing hallucination.
LikeLiked by 1 person
At least the early Brits are still being categorized as 100% human. :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
We all–not just the Brits–are, Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA and all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know why our politicians keep trying to control migrations. It seems inevitable. Thanks for this fascinating essay.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It will be even more inevitable as climate change makes swathes of the planet uninhabitable–and as that leads to more conflict. But they’ve discovered that they can weaponize the issue and get elected. And as wealth is further and further concentrated at the top (and–isn’t it odd how these line up?) poverty is concentrated at the increasingly large bottom, it gives them someone to blame who doesn’t make huge contributions to their campaign funds.
Cynical? Me?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said! And, the cynicism is warranted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘Fraid you’re right.
LikeLike
The English often have black hair. See the Beatles. (Boris Judas Johnson surely is a recent invader). 😉
My family is mostly from Brittany. (Invaded and evangelized by the Bretons around the 6th century. Give or take one). One of my eldest brothers is what others would call “Black Irish.” Black hair and blue eyes…
Said blue eyes (mine are green, hehe), according to the Danes all go back to a grandmother 6,000 years ago in the Caucasian mountains…
Love DNA…
Be good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, people who believe in racial purity have a lot of annoying evidence to stub their toes on. I wish them many bruised toes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
😉
LikeLiked by 1 person