Let’s talk about search engine terms. No, I’m not going to hand out blogging advice. You won’t find any advice here that you’d want to follow, on blogging or any other subject. What I want to explore is that strange and lovely world of search engines and algorithms and other things I don’t understand, about which I want to ask the following profound question: What the hell are they thinking?
I know, thinking’s the wrong word. Algorithms don’t think. Someone does, though. A human mind, with an actual human being attached to it, programs these suckers and sets them loose on the world trusting that they’ll connect the right question to the right answer.
Or not caring if they do.

A chough, pronounced “chuff,” Cornwall’s official bird. It was driven to extinction in Cornwall, but a few years ago a pair flew over from Ireland and bred successfully and a handful can now be found. Those who know are keeping their locations secret. I know, at least vaguely, and I’m not telling. Photo by Ida Swearingen, and she isn’t telling either.
And then there are the people who type some of these terms into Google. Spare a moment to wonder what they’re thinking as well.
So here’s how people found Notes from the U.K. (I’ll do a separate post on vaguely relevant search terms. Sooner or later.) They typed in (with Google’s lower case format carefully preserved):
good comments with u: All my good comments contain that letter. Except this one. My bad ones? They don’t.
who are the bigwigs in legal highs: . Okay, I’m pretty clear on what this poor kid was looking for and can make an educated guess or three about what they planned to do with the information. And they were so disappointed to end up in the middle of a discussion of lawyers’ wigs. Sorry, kid. Now get off the internet and go finish your homework. And remember to use the letter u.
kittens dash into rooms they shouldn’t: Rooms and dash are clear enough to work with, but we need a definition of shouldn’t. They shouldn’t because they’ll get scolded? Because they’ll get eaten by the Minotaur? Or the Merrimac? Anyway, we need to define the term. And we need video, which I don’t do. And come to think of it, how young a kitten do they want to see? So I was a disappointment here. I do have a page of kitten pictures, which I haven’t updated lately now that I think about it, but I can’t imagine I’m high up the Google list. How many web sites and blogs did the googler go to before being disappointed by mine? What is it about kittens and the internet that someone went through that many links looking for this?
dog poo for rubbish collection Cornwall: For this, they need to contact the county. Unless they’re looking for dog poo itself. If they can convince me it’s a good idea to donate it, we have plenty. And a nice collection of the cat variety as well. But, well, I will need convincing.
Sumerdress: These are what they wore in Sumeria? Sorry, this isn’t a fashion blog.
kitten club: I can make a fair guess about which regular readers would join, but I don’t know where to refer them. And a kitten a month? It’s too many. No matter how cute they are. Plus it’s wrong to ship them. They need to be hand delivered, lovingly.
notes of the kettle: This was weird enough that I googled it myself and was, sure enough, led to one of my posts, “Putting the kettle on,” as well as to notes from a community meeting that included the subhead “Vott is kettle,” which is all about JavaScript. Why is said “vott” instead of “what” is a mystery. Or maybe “vott” isn’t a mispronunciation of what but some arcane bit of geek speak. You know: “I’m going to vott your computer now. Stand back.” I’d love to give you a link to this so you don’t think I made it up, but I didn’t copy it down at the time—I was too busy being baffled—and it won’t come up again, but if you want to buy a whistling kettle, several of those links popped up. I think it was when I typed in “vott is kettle.” The connection’s obvious, isn’t it? The kettle whistles and you run into the kitchen yelling, “Vott iz itt dis time?” (Sorry, my phony accent’s a bit woozy. I’m not sure what language group I’m supposed to be imitating and I doubt I’d get it right if I was sure. Normally I wouldn’t stoop to making fun of someone’s accent, but it’s justified this time. Necessary even.) You can find out about Kettle Knudson, who’s either from or visited Bemidji, Minnesota, I’m not sure which, but the story’s in the Bemidji Pioneer. On this I could give you some links but not having them introduces an element of randomness that’s way more fun. What does it all mean, bartender?
tumblr pics of fully clothed grandmothers: I hardly know where to start with this one. Is a website somewhere offering pics of semi-naked grandmothers? And if there is, how do we know the pictures are of genuine grandmothers and not women like me, of a grandmotherly age but without grandchildren, which by any definition I understand disqualifies me from grandmotherhood? I mean, how much less of a turn-on is it once you know the background’s been faked? You won’t find me on any site of that sort. Not only won’t I lower myself to pretend I have grandchildren but because my clothes are tattooed on, so I’m always fully clothed. Even in the shower. So, how did they find Notes with that in the search engine? The only one of these words I remember using is of, although it’s not impossible that I said everyone somewhere or other was fully clothed. It sounds like me. And in many of the places I go, including the supermarket, they are. Time after time. In fact, even as I type this, I’m fully clothed. It’s chilly in the morning at this time of year. I only frighten the neighbors in warm weather. As for what the googler was looking for, I can only speculate. And I’m not sure I want to.
that last one is disturbing!
Not quite as disturbing as some of Nancy’s search terms on https://myyearofsweat.wordpress.com/2014/05/12/a-little-bit-of-this-and-a-little-bit-of-that/
some of which I feel a tiny bit responsible for…
At one point my the search term people used the most to find my blog was “why does it take 365 days to go from one midsummer to the next” or words to that effect… i declared that if people didn’t know that I didn’t want them on my blog! (which may be a little judgmental but never mind)
I love the idea of a kitten club…but you are right, one kitten a month is too many…there would soon be chaos…fuzzy cute chaos…and the manpower to deliver them would be phenomenal as you are right about the shipping…
LikeLiked by 3 people
You’re right: Not half as disturbing. That’s Nancy’s search terms, but yours as well. I mean, even I can explain the 365 days. And if I can explain something with a number in it, then, come on, anybody should be able to take a rough guess.
Or so you’d think.
But it gave me a good laugh, so all’s well. I’ll go tell my cats we won’t be having any kitten deliveries this month. They both say two cats is plenty. The first cat says two is more than enough.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I feel a tiny bit responsible for a couple of Nancy’s search terms, we dance a dance called Spank the Monkey which I mention in her comments a fair bit :-)
I have consulted with my 3 and they agree that more kittens would not be desirable! They feel there would not be enough shrews to go around!
LikeLiked by 1 person
In these days of austerity, I’m sure they’re right. Nothing can be wasted–especially shrews. Eddie, it turns out, isn’t much of a hunter. He’s been bringing in leaves. I think he’s building a tree somewhere, but I haven’t found it yet. So the shrews here think they’re safe in case yours want to travel.
And yes, I did wonder how you’d contributed to Nancy’s search term list.
LikeLiked by 2 people
the rate we are going through shrews don’t be surprised if you find two little black and white kittens and one tortie kitten on your doorstep with all their possessions in a hankie on a stick asking to be directed to the shrews!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll have cat food and cushions ready. Do tell them the dog’s friendly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will be sure to let them know :-)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for making me laugh this morning. Wonderful posting!
LikeLiked by 2 people
And thanks for letting me know I did. That cheers up my afternoon.
LikeLike
Now you have started the big trouble. I have seen it happen before, with other bloggers.
Once you actually start to mention the odd things that people search for to find your blog, the search engines will notice the discussion, and your blog will become a magnet for people searching for images of fully clothed grandmothers, votts of kettles of votts and kittens, and Sumerian sundresses.
Now you know where all of your followers come from. I believe that I typed in “how do u c a fully clothed wall of corn, u know a corn wall ex-pat not grandmother.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
I always do wonder how people find me, so thanks for letting me know that. And I have mentioned corn, although not, as far as I can remember, in conjunction with wall. Unless it was to say that the cornbread was so bad I threw it at the wall, although if I said that I might as well admit right now that it wasn’t true. Not that anything has to be true for an algorithm to pick it up. So yes, of course it was a sensible way to find me. Now, vott’s all this about kittens?
LikeLiked by 1 person
pretty wild, I had no idea! I found you ’cause wordpress thought I’d enjoy your posts (good algorythm?) and have had sufficient suggestions from them to feed me interesting conversations. I also see that people sometimes visit when I comment their posts. Now you’ve got me wondering how a couple of bizarre bloggers found me :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been surprised a few times to see that people found me by typing the name of the blog into Google. It’s so straightforward, who’d have thought it worked? I’m grateful to WordPress for suggesting me. I tried their suggestions early on and didn’t find much that interested me, but that may be because I hadn’t worked out what actually interested me yet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
a lot of their suggestions don’t work for me, but I check them all and get a gem – like yours :) – from time to time
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m so glad you did.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL – I always love posts like this one. Gives you a tiny glimpse into the human psyche, and it’s kinda hilarious/terrifying!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes to both–hilarious and terrifying. Strange species, aren’t we?
LikeLiked by 2 people
This was hysterically funny. It’s all a mystery to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And to me. Clearly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh yes I have some very disturbing searches showing up on mine too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
They do make a person stop and wonder.
LikeLike
I found this post full of good advice, which I shall be taking directly; thus, I disagree that you should be let off the advice hook just yet.
In fact, I’m wearing my Sumerian dress to Bemidji this evening to present my new line of PermaGram autumn girdles, followed by a delivery of poodle shXX, ahem poop, to the Junior Vice Duke-in-waiting and Keeper of the Earl of Tidypants’ Extra Retainer.
And thanks to the advce Google unearthed because of you, I expect to end the evening in his castle, Kitten Club getting gloriously and legally high.
Ellen, my dear, I must say you have demonstrated a rare gift for getting right to the heart of British culture You owe it to your readers to devote yourself to an advice column.
I already have three question to get you started:
1) Does the Queen Mother wear PermaGram?
2) Does a Earl beat a Duke?
3) Does a full house beat a straight?
P.S. Me for real – Your post is absolutly hysterical!! And it fits everywhere
LikeLiked by 2 people
Um. A duke beats an earl, but only if he’s younger, stronger, and knows how to fight. A duck beats a chicken. No reason for that, it’s just how things are. And carrots beat kale anytime. I’m not sure about the full house and the straight. Back when I drove cab, I discovered two things about playing cards: 1. I really like gambling. 2. I’m a lousy player. That didn’t seem like a healthy combination, so I quit after one longish wait at the airport, playing tonk. And yes, I did win some money, but it was through dumb luck, not skill.
Now, let’s get serious. What’s PermaGram? A permanent telegram? A metric wave for your hair? A girdle you can’t take off? It’s academic, though, because the Queen Mother’s dead. I guess she’s wearing something, but probably it isn’t anything she chose.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well then who’s that old lady living in Buckingham Palace and why isn’t Philip king? Or the older Prince, What’s his Name, married to the ever-annoying Kate? Good god, your’e not going to go with Harry, are you? That gene pool’s too small…It’s bad enough they gave Harry a gun, military authority, and a boat.
You people are evidently getting altogether too careless. If you’ve got a monarchy, you’ve can’t let it run around unsupervised.
Hey, wait a minute, I’m Irish! What the hell do I care?
Big Mouth O’Brien
.
Note to your English readers: This is humor. That’s all it is. It’s in no way meant to offend or disrespect. I save the latter for my own global threat, I mean my own country. (;:
LikeLiked by 1 person
The old lady living in Buckingham Palace? That’s the queen, not the queen mother. Phil’s her husband. He doesn’t get to be king, no matter who kicks off. Either wisely or unwisely, he close the wrong parents for that. Some things just can’t be undone. Next in line is William, poor fellow. The job doesn’t look like a lot of fun, although god knows it pays well. I’m of the of the opinion that the anti-monarchists missed a trick when they didn’t adopt the slogan “Free the royals.”
LikeLike
Hey your readers are as wacky as mine!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, I’d put them up against anybody’s. Don’t you love it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
My top search query is a freaking porn star LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
I won’t ask for an explanation. I understand that it wouldn’t help if I did.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha ha ha! What a wonderful collection of random googler visits. I must admit that the main reason I ever view my blog stars is to see what random Google terms have brought people to my blog. I would say 75% of them are mystifying or bizarre and I mostly cannot fathom how that search term brought anyone to my blog. I probably ought to note them down somewhere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, do. Please.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been keeping a tick list of countries that have visited my blog (my husband tells me I’m never going to get North Korea or Vatican City) so I should start keeping note of Google terms too. I will start from today.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We should start thinking of the Google terms as an art form.
As for Vatican City, I know someone whose sister got locked in one of the toilet stalls. When someone finally broke her loose, she announced that she’d been beatified. So it might be worth a trip.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Bwah ha ha ha! When she’s canonized, you will have to tell me her Saint name. She could be the patron saint of constipation or awkward encounters.
LikeLiked by 2 people
If it were my choice, I’d take awkward encounters. Surely that needs a saint.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not a Christian so I’m ignorant about all but the most famous saints but I suspect there’s probably already a patron saint of constipation anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I had the same thought, but it didn’t come to me until I’d hit Post. I’m sure there is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I had to google: Saint Bonaventure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s something ironic about that name as a patron saint of constipation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha ha! I had not thought of that but it totally is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A colleague once asked me to explain a language we were using for constructing algorithms. He just couldn’t get it. “The first thing you have to understand,” I told him, “is that it is a language for the painfully literal.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
If I think about it long enough, I may come to understand how some of this is literally applicable. And when (and if) that happens, it will frighten me right down to my bones.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It should…because it will be peering directly into the mind of God.
Well…maybe if not God, a really, really big machine. Same thing actually.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read this (after replying to several other conversation threads) and thought, What exactly were were talking about here? But, um, yes, got it. Right. God. Mind of. Computer. Atheist. Oops. Wait. I do believe in computers. If they’re the same thing, am I having a crisis of lack-of-faith?
I need to take a tea break here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I spent thirty years designing computer systems and the more time I spent with them, the less I believed in them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
(Still haven’t headed off for that cup of tea.) So I don’t have to have a crisis? Great. I’m too busy for one just now.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The comments here are almost as delightful as the original post! Whether or not they contain a “u”!
I just checked mine to see what entertainment I might add. Sadly, not much. Many variations on the theme of “how do I talk to my therapist about masturbation” — which both genuinely makes me sad AND makes total sense. (I mean, I’ve got a post that starts with that set-up. Doesn’t answer the question, though.) My favorite head-scratcher is the search for “sex in bed,” as though “in bed” constitutes some arcane and rare sexual phenomenon requiring specialized training.
Also? If you ever want a topic to entice the sumerdress seeker to return, I understand Innana was one snazzy fashion plate, At least for special occasions, yknow, like descending to the underworld or hanging out with her hubby, the Plague God.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If I ever feel myself running dry, I’ll write about what to wear when descending to the underworld or hanging out with the plague god. I should be able to dash off a thousand words about that without too much trouble. Unless you decide to do it first. Great topic. Wanna arm wrestle for it?
No, no, you suggested it first. It’s yours.
Sex in bed is an odd one to search for. Especially if you know about sex. And about beds. It’s just like sex in the kitchen, but more comfortable. And further from the whipped cream.
Okay, I’ll stop now. Really. That’s enough, Ellen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for ceding the “what to wear” post; I’m the absolute pits when it comes to arm-wrestling. (My money’s on “exorbitant amounts of lapis lazuli,” btw.)
Seems that someone thorough enough to google “sex in bed” would also be someone who advance-stashes a can of whipped cream in the boudoir. But that’s just me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sure you’re right. I’ve never been that thorough. Or that interested in whipped cream.
I’ll look forward to your what-to-wear post. I’m massively ill-suited to it, which is what drew me to the idea in the first place. And for future reference, I don’t arm wrestle well, but I do issue a mean challenge.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Noted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was a sad day when Google started hiding the majority of search terms. I’m pretty sure we’re not seeing the best ones any more.
I quickly Googled “vott is kettle” and am happy to report that this post is currently number 2 for that search string, though Google thinks I should be searching for “pot vs kettle” instead. One can never satisfy the Google.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow. With a popular search term like that, I’ll be swamped any day now.
I’ve wondered what those “unknown search terms” were. How could they possibly be unknown? They passed through Google’s virtual intestines. It’s enough to kick up a massive case of conspiracy-theory paranoia: What are they hiding from us?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chuckles served with my oatmeal once again. Visions of partially clothed grandmothers floating in my semi-awake state. You have inspired me to look at those search terms in my blog on occasion. The last time I thought of doing so it seemed to be mostly about potatoes. Didn’t seem to tempt me to go back for a second look.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I should have googled them myself–I knew that–but my courage failed.
LikeLike
I laughed until it hurt. Funny, funny stuff. Thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry to cause pain, but it sounds like a good thing.
LikeLike
I was curious about the choughs. Were they extinct from being tasty? Apparently not. Driven out by the bad “chuffed” jokes? Much more likely.
LikeLike
Bad jokes are a possibility, but I’d guess egg collectors had something to do with it. I’m not really sure. I should check, but this morning isn’t the time for it. If I find anything out, I’ll post something.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just imagine my joy when I saw that somebody found my blog with “Lutheran funeral jello”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not Lutheran, but I lived in Minnesota long enough to think “Lutheran funeral jello” is a perfectly sensible set of words. I seem to remember Louise Erdrich doing something very funny with it in one of her early novels. Exactly why someone would google it I’m not sure. Maybe they haven’t been to a funeral for a while and miss it.
LikeLike
Hi Ellen,
Your post at my Meet and Greet sounded intriguing , so I came over. Thank you for sharing it. I actually wrote Sunday about how people find blogs.
Janice
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hopefully in some better way than these people who stumbled into mine. Thanks for stopping by.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahah, this is an amazing post Ellen! I laughed a lot.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wonderful. Thanks for letting me know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: International Weekly Link Roundup #4 | Mostly Blogging
I loved this post so much. I needed a good laugh today and it seems I came to the right place :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love knowing I made you laugh when you needed that.
LikeLike
Pingback: The Belgian Christadelphian ecclesia sites 2015 in review – Belgian Ecclesia Brussel – Leuven
The #1 search for people who come to my blog via Google:
why
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s it? Why? Do you know the answer?
LikeLike