A politician made a valiant attempt to defend the honor of a colleague last week and accidentally brought the whole British Parliament into disrepute. Or further disrepute. Or just possibly none of the above. Take your pick once I tell you the tale.
Sir Malcolm Bruce, a former deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats, tried to defend Lib Dem MP Alistair Carmichael by saying that if every MP was kicked out of office for lying “we would clear out the House of Commons very fast.”
(Note: You can follow that link safely. Unlike the one in last Tuesday’s post, you won’t find any mankinis on the other end.)
Did Bruce mean that lying was widespread in public life? a BBC interviewer asked.
“No,” he said. “Well, yes.”
Or, just possibly, both of the above. I’m a great fan of all of the above and none of the above, especially when they’re not logical possibilities. They give us an illusion of choice and expansiveness and—well, I don’t think freedom is too high-flown a word for this. Sure, the world may be falling apart and the weather’s getting stranger by the year, but the range of what’s possible just expanded beyond what’s possible and if that ain’t freedom, my friend, what is?
So once again, take your pick. And if you want it to be both all of the above and none of the above at the same time, be my guest: Pick both. There’s no charge.
But back to our story. Carmichael got into trouble by authorizing a leak before the recent election and then denying that he knew anything about it, and it was the denial that caused the problem, not the leak or even that the information he leaked was apparently inaccurate. Or made up, which is a polite way of saying a lie. You can take your choice there too. We’re just rolling in choices today.
For the sake of both British and non-British readers, I won’t go into the details. Brits have already heard about it and for everyone else I’m already teetering on the edge of incomprehensibility with all this talk of Lib Dems and MPs and disrepute. A politician’s in disrepute? American readers are asking themselves. And this makes the news why? (Am I being unfair here? Are readers in other countries asking the same question?) Besides, the content is almost never what matters in these scandals, it’s cover-up that gets politicians in trouble. How come? Because that’s what we, the ordinary newspaper readers and evening news watchers, can wrap our heads around.
Oh, sure, if someone someone slept with someone they weren’t supposed to sleep with, we can follow that without waiting for the cover-up. But the real scandals? The ones involving billions of dollars, or pounds, or whatevers? The ones, say, involving the banks and the Great Recession of 2008? They’re so deeply incomprehensible that our eyes go glazy the minute we hear about them and I’d better end this paragraph fast or you’’ll all click onto something else.
I’m almost inclined to admire ol’ Malcolm. (Sorry, I just can’t call anyone “Sir.” Like ironing, it’s against my religion.) The impulse to defend a colleague, and for all I know a friend, led him to tell the truth as he knows it, which is that in politics almost everyone lies. Or maybe that should be everyone. Yet another chance to take your pick.
I don’t know which you chose just then, and I don’t suppose it changed anything, but didn’t it give you a wonderful feeling, as if your life had just grown larger?
I really liked being included in the post and given multiple answers to your questions. Fun.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, it was a bit like one of those adventure novels I loved as a kid – “If you think x happened, go to page 26. If you think y happened, go to page 30.” As you say, fun!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’d like to think Fast Eddie is bored with the concept of yet another politician lying. In fact, that seems to be the overwhelming response to the post. I’m hoping that’ll change, but so far it seems to be a real snoozer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t say I blame him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Political corruption has no boundaries. Politicians can blame themselves for the poor reputation and that nobody trusts them anymore.
LikeLiked by 1 person
On that we can agree.
LikeLike
I’m with Fast Eddie on this one!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good to know.
LikeLike
I love what you said about money scandals vs sex scandals. I’ve seen a lot about this since of one of my British Facebook friends has been posting a lot. I think I’ll pass this post onto him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great. Thanks.
LikeLike
Rather quaint, isn’t it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It struck me that way.
LikeLike
My goodness! I can’t remember the last time I had so many choices on how to view something….does make my mind spin! Do know that I appreciate the notice of safe link you gave after last time I followed one of your links, and also know that you and I have the same religion that prevents ironing. That’s about all I know, but that is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth! :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s always good to meet a co-religionist. There aren’t enough of us in this world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely admire your political interests and competency!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. I’m so flattered I won’t try to make a joke about that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I started to read this post, and then I saw the photo of ADORABLE Fast Eddie, and well… I stopped reading the blog and went straight down to comment. That’s what you get for posting cat pictures, and I make no apologies for it. PS. Two of my lot (The Sibs) turned six today. meow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wild Thing has a theory that when you adopt two sibling cats they’ll never listen to you, only to each other. Is it true?
LikeLike
I don’t think not listening to you has anything to do with being siblings but more so being a cat. LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
If I needed proof that you understand cats, there it is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I was a cat in another life. We five all sleep in the same positions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m impressed. I can’t get into the positions my cat sleeps in–awake, asleep, or in my wildest imaginings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d vote for Malcolm. Although maybe as a Sir he’s a peer – I don’t understand those rules. It sounds as if he’s a loyal friend and tells the truth at least part of the time. That beats most politicians I’ve seen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess we should take it in the context of politicians and just how often they’re likely to tell the truth, but I can’t figure out if it’s a step forward when they give up the pretense of always telling to truth (yay! they told the truth about lying!) or a step backward (boo! they accept lying as standard practice).
LikeLike
Kinda makes my head hurt either way
LikeLiked by 1 person